Search for: "Witt v. Witt"
Results 761 - 780
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
[iv] The explicit reference to Article IV of the WTO Agreement[v], Article XXIV of GATS[vi] and Article VI:4 of GATS in the recitals to the Decision on Domestic Regulation makes clear the mandate of the CTS – to formulate the necessary disciplines on domestic regulation. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
I. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf will testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Aug. 6 regarding the deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
[v] The negotiating history of the SCM Agreement suggests that the focus of the SCM Agreement was on addressing trade-distorting subsidies offered by Members in their own ‘territories’. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:40 am
The Constitution requires the president both to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and—as Benjamin Wittes and Quinta Jurecic have noted—to swear by oath that he will “faithfully execute” the demands of his or her office. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Ben Sasse spoke for a number of the bill’s critics when he voiced concern that this provision would be unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers: “Many of us think we are bound” by Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
As Benjamin Wittes recently wrote on the subject, “good faith matters. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
” Sedition is a serious charge, but a number of analysts (including Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes) have raised the possibility that certain conduct related to yesterday’s debacle might meet the terms of the statute. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The Kremlin has denied accusations that it hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails in order to interfere with the U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican nominee Donald Trump, dismissing the allegations as “an old trick” and a “maniacal attemp[t] to exploit the Russian theme in the U.S. election campaign. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
Michael T. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
For example, in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
-M.Th.D. ten Napel, Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
In particular, to maintain a fair proportion with 5G spectrum auction prices, license renewal fees should reflect the specific features of the WiMax license renewals, in terms of: (i) actual band quantity; (ii) smaller geographic coverage; (iii) shorter duration; (iv) differences in market potential; and (v) absence of further renewal rights. [read post]
