Search for: "ANDREW DOE" Results 7781 - 7800 of 9,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am by Alyson Grine
See Ralph Richard Banks & Richard Thompson Ford, (How) Does Unconscious Bias Matter? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:56 am by Andrew Moshirnia
(Andrew Moshirnia is a second year law student at Harvard Law School and a CMLP blogger. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 1:22 pm
” That change, in my understanding, is an objective one, does not depend on the end user. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Solicitor General Noel Francisco arguing that Ross does not need to testify. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:31 am by SHG
Enter Andrew Sullivan, in his typically controversial way, raising two examples. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by James Alford
That is the argument law student Andrew Schmidt of the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law makes in a recent article. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Adam Goodman
  In extreme cases of catastrophic injury, a higher but still conventionally determined award is given on the basis that it serves the function purpose of providing substitute comforts and pleasures: Andrews v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:52 am by charonqc
  Because of the curious voting methods of The Labour Party, the first past the post does not usually win. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The new Bill does not appear to make specific provision on this but the explanatory notes state, more generally, that “measures … will maintain transparency, for example by regularising listings and publishing results online“. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Andrew Michaels weighs in on the recent decision in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc., in which the justices ruled that U.S. and overseas sales of a product extinguish the patentholder’s rights to sue for infringement, arguing that “[a]lthough the result is defensible, the Court does not offer much in the way of a nuanced defense,” but that “[i]nstead, the Court… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:17 pm by admin
If he does, our prediction is that another round of appeals is sure to follow. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:45 am
Bush does not seem to be into self-sacrifice. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
We conclude that the foregone conclusion exception does not apply here. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Accordingly, the order of the Supreme Court, [*4]New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered April 26, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant Getzel Schiff & Pesce, LLP’s motion to dismiss, should be reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
  The opinion prompted coverage from nearly every major news outlet, including Joan Biskupic of the USA Today, Tom Schoenberg and Andrew Harris of Bloomberg News, Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico, Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press, Jeremy Pelofsky and Lisa Lambert of Reuters, Noam M. [read post]
In other words, the government got it wrong about 75 percent of the time — and that number does not even include the hundreds of detainees released without charge by the Bush administration. [read post]