Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
[codifying and renaming the Community Redevelopment Law, Health & Saf. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In Taylor Patterson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Again, on May 27, 2009, the same day that the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8 in Perry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
In a case fashioned after the California Supreme Court's decision in Pineda v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:06 am
In a case fashioned after the California Supreme Court's decision in Pineda v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:03 pm
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
In MicroVention, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
In MicroVention, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
In MicroVention, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 9:03 am
Industries v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
It's by UC Hastings College of Law Professor Vikram David Amar. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:47 am
v=LJda5OJep_8). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:23 am
Goss mentioned a development in California’s law. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
Linda Greenhouse and Reva Siegel, Yale Law, have posted, in its entirety, their documentary history, Before Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
To do so violates the Debtors’ right to equal protection of those laws embodied in the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.The Court concludes by invoking Justice Douglas’ love letter to marriage in Griswold v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:05 am
Wade, which established the constitutional right to an abortion, and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
The peculiarities of California law, however, have left federal courts unable to use it as a predicate offense under USSG § 4B1.1. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
As explained in Stephen, California procedural law – unlike the Federal Rules – required an immediate appeal upon denial of certification specifically because successive motions are not permitted:It is only in the absence of relevant state precedent that courts turn to federal law and rule 23 for guidance. [] State and federal courts parted company on the appealability issue 24 years ago in Daar v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:26 am
MGA appealed the lower court judgment.On July 22, 2010, in MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
