Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 7781 - 7800 of 8,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 3:09 pm
Bosland appealed to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
The clerk of this court is directed to send, with the copy of this opinion sent to the superior court, a copy of the recitals re: stipulation to reverse, with the attached settlement agreement, filed in this court April 2, 2008. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
Justice Bruce of the BC Supreme Court released reasons for judgement (Scott v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
The need to deter polluters, perceived to be present in the toxic tort context, does not apply to life sciences companies. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Georgia Courts continue to recognize this evidentiary burden as seen most recently in Custer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Employee required to answer employer's work-related inquiriesSpielbauer v County of Santa Clara [Calif.], Supreme Court of California, decided February 9, 2009. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:47 am
Christie does not have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the information associated with his IP address.U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Nor does it require a showing (necessary under Rule 23(b)(3)) that common issues “predominate” over individual issues, or that a class action is “superior” to other approaches. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that Canadians have no expectation of privacy in their online identity. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
The Court FINDS further that the case law is clear about incident reports and that the Quality Care Control Report in question does not appear to be privileged under Va. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
  While New Jersey is not one of the few states with legalized gay marriage (only Massachusetts and Connecticut currently permit same-sex marriages), it does allow couples to enter into civil unions pursuant to N.J.S.A. 37:1-36, which was enacted following the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling in Lewis v. [read post]