Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 7781 - 7800 of 12,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 10:01 am by Christopher Flowers
At first glance, Fantex’s strategy to raise capital appears pretty straightforward. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
The court first noted that loss under the CFAA means any reasonable cost to the victim, and lost revenue or other damages incurred as a result of an interruption of service. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm by Florian Mueller
While the facts of any given case might ultimately lead to the conclusion that the infringer would not have been able to begin to design around the patent starting on the date of first infringement, one would need to begin the analysis at the date of first infringement to avoid arbitrarily ignoring actions the infringer could have taken in lieu of infringing." [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:23 am by Florian Mueller
Therefore, Sprint feels an ITC exclusion order "would provide Nokia with disproportionate value, in terms of at least negotiation leverage and impact in the marketplace, that exceeds the benefit properly attributable to the infringed claims". [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
In a November 14, 2013 decision, Judge Denny Chin (continuing a case in which he presided before joining the Second Circuit) granted summary judgment in favor of Google, Inc in the long-running case by The Authors Guild, Inc. based on the fair use defense to copyright infringement. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
©2013KF1524.3 .C87 2013 Bankruptcy The essentials of Chapter 7& 13 bankruptcy practice.Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, [2013]KFP81 .P4 No.7788         Civil Procedure Twenty-first century procedure / Christopher B. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:37 am
South Miami-Dade lobbyist Michael Kesti first approached the FBI in 2011 informing them of his suspicions that Candia was in league with corrupt politicians in South Florida. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]