Search for: "Green v. Green" Results 7781 - 7800 of 8,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am by INFORRM
IPSO Resolution Statement – 00079-25 A woman v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, Resolved – IPSO mediation 06633-24 Williams-Key v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05903-24 Ross v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 04922-24 Garfield v The National, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies Associated Newspapers… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon)   Colombia… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
” On 29 June 2017 Green J handed down judgment in the case of Hussain v Sandwell Metropolitan BC [2017] EWHC 1641 (Admin) which contains some interesting discussion of data protection principles applicable to publication of information. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, “asserted on Sunday that Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am by Michael Scutt
The list of potentially protectable beliefs under the Religion and Philosophy part of the Equality Act was added to, with belief in “Green issues” established last year by Grainger PLC v Nicholson, being joined by a belief in the ethos of the Joe Hashman BBC, and being fervently opposed to fox hunting (Hashman v Orchard Park Garden Centre). [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Green Building Law Update discusses the defamation case against Greenpeace here. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
Lord Justice Green and Mr Justice Kerr found that the Government had acted unlawfully in creating the Public Order Act 2023, which gave the police “almost unlimited” powers to restrict protests. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Nicklin J in Riley v Murray [2021] EWHC 3437 (QB) on 20 December 2021. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]