Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 7781 - 7800 of 18,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
  The IPKat in his favourite holiday retreatKicking right in the week, court report from the UK: Sky v SkyKick - no CJEU reference re removal of own name defence to EUTMs ruled Birss J. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:57 am
Suspension of retirement allowance upon post-retirement employmentMatter of Grella v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 113 Philip M. [read post]
We're holding a month-long blog symposium on women's rights for Women's History Month. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 8:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Sigurdson described this bachelor party attire in his decision in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Criminal Law: Spontaneous Utterances Re IdentificationR. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Singer, 2023 SKCA 123 (41090) Issues re DUI in one’s driveway. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The Court dismisses Actavis' cross-appeal on the basis that if its products did not directly infringe, they would indirectly infringe to the extent held by the Court of Appeal.And, of course, the weekly updates Monday Miscellany and Sunday Surprises.Photo credit: rawdonfoxPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent Drawing Rules I German Supreme Court holds that extra-territorial delivery can result in patent infringement I Canadian… [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Archbishops’ Commission for Racial Justice – Third Report The Archbishops’ Commission for Racial Justice (ACRJ) has published its Summer ’23 Biennial Report, the third in a series of six. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Gagnon, 2015 CMAC 2 (36844) Is s. 230.1 of the National Defence Act unconstitutional re prosecutorial independence. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]