Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 7781 - 7800 of 21,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
City of New York, finding the City of New York liable in connection with its stop-and-frisk policy for violating the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause’s guarantee against discrimination. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:19 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Depending on the strength of the evidence and the jury, these cases could go several ways—with a verdict finding the defendant not liable, finding the defendant liable, or finding them both negligent. [read post]
In response, the petitioners requested the court to lift the prosecution’s immunity and hold the prosecutors personally liable if the accused persons chose to sue for malicious prosecution. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:16 pm
Depending on the circumstances surrounding a personal injury or wrongful death case, the negligent medical worker's employer, such as a hospital or another type of facility, could also be held liable for medical malpractice.In California, medical malpractice plaintiffs have three years from the date the injury occurred or one year from the time the victim should have found out or did discover that the injury was a result of medical malpractice to file a lawsuit against the… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:45 pm
” For the retailer defendants, the judge ruled that because plaintiffs’ claims against the dairy are preempted, “the retailer Defendants cannot be liable. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, to be criminally liable for the robbery itself, he must also be shown to have shared the same specific intent or mental culpability as the actual perpetrator, and this was not done. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 11:40 am by Brent Wieand
Determine Who Was Negligent Before suing a hospital for medical negligence, it’s important to understand who may be liable. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by SHG
Probably not, but it will be entirely in the bank’s discretion because they could, per Judge Rakoff, be liable should you be up to no good. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The jury returned a verdict finding the defendants liable under FIRREA, and the federal district judge imposed civil penalties of $1.27 billion on Countrywide and $1 million on a company executive. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:02 pm
that if one's injuries are aggravated or increased by a medical mistake, the original tortfeasor is liable. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Hooper and her husband added Venator, Austin’s employer as a defendant, seeking to hold them vicariously responsible for Mrs. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:41 am by Thomas Nantias
Causation: The plaintiff must show that the defendants breach of duty caused their injury. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by Mike
Aurora Loan Services the plaintiff is contesting the defendant's foreclosure sale. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:08 pm by Steven M. Sweat
Defendants arguments The defendant city argued that there were no plans to improve the intersection before the accident. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by NL
Quadrant argued that the judge erred in finding that the defendant was liable for the dampness in the wall by the wardrobe. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by NL
Quadrant argued that the judge erred in finding that the defendant was liable for the dampness in the wall by the wardrobe. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 1:51 pm
The elements of this cause of action are 1) Plaintiff has a business relationship, not necessarily evidenced by an enforceable contract; 2) Defendant's knowledge of the relationship; 3) Defendant's intentional and unjustifiably interfered with the relationship; and 4) Plaintiff suffered damages .Tortious interference with a contract is virtually identical to the elements of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Bexis
 Basically, plaintiff argued that, because the defendants allegedly promoted an “inadequately tested” off-label use, they should be liable for punitive damages. [read post]