Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
Legal Reasoning (Bryson, O'Malley)Legal Standard for Public Use§ 102(b)'s public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an invention that was “in public use . . . in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
United States, for instance, the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
A public outcry erupted over this mass shooting and the NRA’s central role in promoting weapons proliferation in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
& Clinics v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kokesh v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am
Citizens United is indeed a somewhat reckless (if also predictable) decision; and there is something odd about a State Senator who supported the Massachusetts health reform getting elected by opposing its Federal equivalent. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
SIMPSON, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am
” In State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am
All five of the opinions were worded identically: the cases were reversed and remanded for consideration in light of the US Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
Can the government even prohibit immoral behavior after United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:19 am
” Thomas devoted most of his opinion, however, to a history of the eugenics movement in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm
United States.. . . [read post]
