Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 45,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 2:55 pm
Abouselman (Water Rights)United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
See Lambert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm
In the City of Fort Worth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Where would you have us draw the line if preemption occurs here? [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 11:13 am
Waoh-Tobin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:13 am
Ridley Park Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
Arati Varma is Head of Financial, Professional, and Casualty Lines, Asia, for QBE, based in Singapore. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm
The plaintiffs in the case, Tanzin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am
SPAIN With the recent rise in coronavirus cases, the likelihood of a nationwide second lockdown in Spain is growing. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:57 am
Read the whole opinion in Hudnell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which occurs… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which occurs… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am
., Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Sam Alito, seized upon the opportunity to present his views on the conflict between religious liberty, a right expressly protected under the First Amendment, and the “right to same-sex marriage,” which he describes as “read into the Fourteenth Amendment” in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
In this regard, the section focusing on the first line of the Commission’s reasoning seems to be the most problematic from a legal standpoint. [read post]
