Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 7781 - 7800
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 9:15 pm
Don’t count on donuts, frozen pizza, coffee creamers, or canned cinnamon rolls to go on tasting the same — and don’t count on the federal government to respect your choices in the matter [Peter Suderman, earlier] And of course it was public health advocates and the federal government who helped push foodmakers into the use of trans fats in the first place. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:39 pm
Can’t I just get an annulment? [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
Persons may not misappropriate trademarks to the detriment of consumers or of the marks themselves. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:19 am
After all, why would it matter? [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:08 pm
But it doesn't. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186, 221 (2003) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
17 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Woolworth, 221 N.Y. 425, held that, as a matter of public policy, a charging lien may not attach to a spouse’s award of alimony or maintenance. [read post]
17 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Woolworth, 221 N.Y. 425, held that, as a matter of public policy, a charging lien may not attach to a spouse’s award of alimony or maintenance. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:02 am
#ABATAX Emily Chan: New “.ngo” and “.ong” Domain Names Available for Nonprofits via Nonprofit Law Matters Gene: Cliff Notes to the GIIN-JPMorgan Annual Impact Report – Impact Alpha #socent h/t @kylewestaway Case Foundation: Looking for a primer on #impinv? [read post]
15 May 2015, 8:00 am
Still, ultimately it is a matter of driver attentiveness. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:45 am
” More colorfully, Mark Twain complained that “[t]he jury system puts a ban upon intelligence and honesty, and a premium upon ignorance, stupidity and perjury. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:35 am
” So there it was—as a consumer I had been confused, but from the point of view of the trade mark owner, it would appear that the confusion did not matter. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:20 am
” We then went on to talk about the subject matter. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
The court was satisfied that these defects were cured but told the plaintiffs they may not “friend” potential opt-ins on Facebook, and must “unfollow” from Twitter those who don’t join during the opt-in period (Mark v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:59 pm
Mark Lutz, the CEO of Ingenuity 13, was not allowed to testify. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
If it ain’t broke, don’t break it.Finally, we get to the author’s “fiduciary framework. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Republished by Blog Post PromoterI wrote a couple of days ago — and once again got hit hard by a learned commenter who disagrees with my view of the matter — about the Second Circuit’s ruling in the Rescuecom v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:09 am
ABS has a limited potential for increasing access to justice for those with low incomes because as profit-seekers in the market for legal services, ABS entities don’t have an economic incentive to do so – there’s little ROI for creating innovations or new legal services for that sector. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Starbucks' NOW logoIn this appeal to the Supreme Court, Starbucks (HK), who are broadcasters and not baristas, dropped a claim for infringement of a CTM for a device mark dominated by the word "NOW" with minimal graphical embellishment which was ultimately held invalid. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:35 am
No, you don't. [read post]
