Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 7781 - 7800 of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Sometimes they are used to protect the identity of the person bringing the lawsuit -- for example,  as in the landmark Supreme Court case, Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:41 am
I found it fascinating article on a comparison of the right to exclude others from your property as a very American property right that has its limitations here and is not as true world-wide.I was familiar with the Loretto v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:34 pm by Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
That just might have changed today with the advent of United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a law barring antidiscrimination protection for gay people. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Unfortunately, that's the situation Melinda Hernandez found herself in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:07 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines you may have missed from Wise Law on Twitter : Discord at US Supreme Court is deep, and personal (Jan Crawford/CBS News) Being your own Perry Mason - More people representing themselves in court Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal over disputed election result Tuesday  Class-action lawsuit filed in wake of deadly mall collapse in Elliot Lake Using and Enduring Power of Attorney to Sever a Joint Tenancy Arab Spring Reveals International Court… [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Holder, which struck down part of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Appeals Court Judge Jerry Smith immediately interrupted, asking if DOJ agreed that the judiciary could strike down an unconstitutional law.The DOJ lawyer, Dana Lydia Kaersvang, answered yes -- and mentioned Marbury v. [read post]