Search for: "People v. House" Results 7781 - 7800 of 12,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Such vague terms fail to put people on notice of what speech is prohibited. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
He says in December sales are generally good, although many people take their time house-hunting and window-shopping rather than clinching a deal.The festive season is followed by the traditionally excellent sales months of January, February and March. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
 The informant has killed twelve people instead of previously raiding twelve stash houses. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:02 am by Eugene Volokh
For instance, a requirement that people take off their headgear in court, as a customary acknowledgment of the importance of the proceedings, is generally only a slight burden to most people. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:12 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Conventional thinking would have us believe that it’s just about home-ownership v. social renting v. private renting but the way people live still by-passes these rigid, stale unimaginative parameters. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
The 4th Amendment provides that `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
Starbucks Secret menu hereCat Poop Coffee v Starbucks Coffee here (yes, you read that correctly) [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]