Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 7781 - 7800 of 12,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
Morgan until 2004, now says that phone hacking was “endemic” at the paper. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Hold the Front Page has a piece by Tony Jaffa entitled Data protection and the journalism exemption in practice commenting on the First Tier Tribunal decision in True Vision Productions v ICO. [read post]
The judge might as well say that Trump’s status alone is her basis for jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  So as helpful as it is that students easily be able to find relevant pages from Prigg v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Which is why last summer’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Mace v Tunick was such an eye opener. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
I like opinions in trademark infringement cases that don’t just gloss over LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION issues, but I have to admit I wasn’t ready for what awaited me when, after seeing the tweet reproduced below from Bill Donahue, I undertook to dig into yesterday’s ruling by the Southern District of New York in Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Seth Kreimer
She has provided two pages of densely documented footnotes for every five pages of text. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
{That is not to say that adverse repercussions cannot follow from one's bad conduct as found in litigation or a criminal proceeding and must be shielded from public scrutiny. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Redbox https://t.co/PDYCDmDs1D 2020-04-26 Freezing order made in the UK to enforce trade secret misappropriation judgment in the United StatesMotorola Solut… https://t.co/iwAWqlGowy 2020-04-27 Statutory damages for copyright infringement of a web site about page awarded2020 FC 379 (CanLII) | Biofert Manufa… https://t.co/rLkxftb72G 2020-04-27 Link to York University v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
An expert in administrative law The most sensible part of Justice Breyer’s decision, in this Kat’s view, is the final two pages, where he admits that the Court has no idea of what it is doing in terms of promoting innovation, and says that it should therefore stick with established precedent. [read post]