Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 18 (1971); Lewis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court's June 26 decisions in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm
The Wells Fargo choice-of-law paragraph states as follows: This Agreement and your account, as well as our rights and duties and your rights and duties regarding this Agreement and your account, will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the United States and, to the extent applicable, the law of the State of South Dakota, regardless of where you reside or use your account at any time. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
United States) on for background noise. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court in 2006, held that public employee speech made pursuant to “official duties” does not have First Amendment protection, and cannot form the basis for a retaliation claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At ACSblog, Erwin Chemerinsky discussed Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:49 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Herb Reed Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
In Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:30 pm
In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
As such, managers that rely on the CFTC’s Rule 4.13(a)(3) exemption from registration as a CPO, and managers that are registered CPOs operating under the CFTC Rule 4.7 exemption, remain prohibited from marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am
A reversal of this finding will result in a remand of the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:36 am
He had served in the United States Air Force for 25 years attached to the space program before retiring in 2001 as a full colonel. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
