Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm
But the Graham bill - like Democratic proposals for federal laws protecting abortion against state restrictions - is a reminder that key elements of both parties' bases would be happy to enact a federal takeover of abortion law, if given the chance. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:53 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
The Court’s Priority Policy states that the application will be ranked. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Wadhwa v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:49 am
” Accordingly, the test was quickly criticized, and the Court had a chance to refine the Elrod analysis in Branti v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:10 am
Jackson Women’s Health Org., the challenge to a Mississippi law that generally bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, and United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 10:51 am
See Jacob v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:43 am
Apple, the App Store antitrust case that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear in 2 1/2 weeks.I discussed Epic v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:53 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
The major case in 1981, Cosner v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:46 am
The 8th shot that down last week in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
The state court held that it was bound by a 2011 California Intermediate Appellate Court decision in the case of Luther v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
” There is a good chance the Court will have to consider that question in the next Term or two. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:23 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Perhaps the state will establish protective habitats. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:16 pm
., v. [read post]
