Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 7781 - 7800 of 29,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:47 pm
By giving the Court's imprimatur to racial justice, a movement marched forward in the states, the courts, in Congress and in the streets. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
That’s had more of an impact on records reflecting back-and-forth between agencies and Congress, but I’m still glad to see it rejected here.AB: This result is unfortunate because State governors should be able to receive confidential advice from the armed forces under their command, as the court acknowledged. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit today decided City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm by William A. Ruskin
 The states are seeking a policy outcome that the administration, Congress and EPA have not been willing to adopt. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm by Brian Wolfman
The following excerpt summarizes Stone's findings: [T]the eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Quicken Loans and Blueford v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
(The Congressional Research Service is a branch of the Library of Congress that prepares nonpartisan reports on topics requested by members of Congress. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:55 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The D.C. federal district court has rejected the plaintiffs’ attempt in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
  In this view, Congress’s attempt to authorize states to provide assistance that the federal executive does not want would amount to a violation of separation of powers. [read post]