Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 7781 - 7800 of 11,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., was clearly one of the most important church-state rulings that the Court had issued since its 1990 ruling, in a case involving a Native American church ritual of smoking peyote. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm by Andrew Berger
Even the same case may produce a much different result on retrial, as evidenced by Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:56 am
  Border Patrol stops him and determines that he's an unauthorized alien, and has been previously deported from the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
On the other hand, he basically seemed, at least from my perspective, to think that if the court were simply to reaffirm what it did in FCC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
At the end of the hour of argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Cicelski Having just returned from watching oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
The Court of Appeal found that the fact that Liberty did not seek to rely on Argo's breach of warranty until nearly seven years after the letter, when it was raised in its defence, did not constitute an unequivocal representation that it would not rely on the breach . [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) At SCOTUSBlog, Lyle Denniston characterizes the oral argument in Sackett v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm by David S. Cohen
Just in time for the start of the semester, Lakhdar Boumediene, the lead plaintiff in Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by WSLL
The State raises two issues:  Whether the district court arbitrarily applied the “assertion of innocence” factor of the seven-factor Frame test, in deciding that the appellant could not withdraw his guilty plea, and whether that decision was otherwise reasonable. [read post]