Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7781 - 7800 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm by Mary Dwyer
Powell bars habeas relief if the state fails to raise Stone in the district court, or whether Stone announced a categorical rule that Fourth Amendment claims are not cognizable on habeas review absent a showing that the state prisoner was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in state court; (2) whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in relying on studies that were not part of the… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front:  United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  Promising news for the petitioner in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Flores, in which the petitioner was an Archbishop), no matter how devoted he might be to his Catholicism and to the Church. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
It appears that the Department sent the notice of disciplinary action by Certified Mail but that the envelope was returned as "unclaimed" by the United States Postal Service. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 5:02 am by Kiel Brennan-Marquez
United States, centered on 26 USC § 7212(a), the so-called Omnibus Clause of the Internal Revenue Code, which criminalizes the act of "corruptly or by force or threat of force ... obstruct[ing] or imped[ing], or endeavor[ing] to obstruct or impede, the due administration of [taxes]. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Sean Wajert
Unlike the United States and its agencies, federal contractors do not enjoy absolute immunity. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am by Sai Vinod
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 10:57 am by Jon L. Gelman
The ruling will have a major impact upon the overburdened state’s Division of Workers’ Compensation (NJDWC) system. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:30 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
However, to succeed in this kind of suit, the petitioner must first identify the biological father. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:20 pm by Steve Vladeck
You may not even care about the merits of Al-Nashiri's claim (whether, at the time of the Cole bombing in October 2000, the United States was already involved in an "armed conflict" under the laws of war with al Qaeda, which is what the MCA itself requires in order for the commissions to have jurisdiction). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
United States (No. 21-40680), the Fifth Circuit heard argument over the validity DHS’s 2012 memorandum establishing the DACA policy. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
  The ITC mandate is to investigate “whether an article is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof, to the domestic industry producing an article like or directly competitive with the imported article. [read post]