Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 7781 - 7800 of 24,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am by Fiona de Londras
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
  For the record, my opinions here track closely to my view of the convergence issue between the United States and Europe: too much deference to different theoretical priors without respectfully hashing out how those priors hold up to available evidence. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm by David Kopel
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:27 am
The report is billed as a "comprehensive" review of the voting systems used in Ohio, which are also used throughout the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
  In general, common law jurisdictions such as England & Wales, the United States of America, Canada and Australia have substantially greater guidance available, reflecting a well-developed practice of using surveys as evidence. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
  You can, if you are interested, read more about habeas procedure in the United States in the article you can find here. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:03 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Safe Harbor program that was designed to facilitate the transfer of personal data of individuals in the European Union (EU) to the United States. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am by Joseph Koncelik
The NWPR replaces the Obama Administration’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
and that piracy only constituted robbery on the high seas per the 1820 Supreme Court decision United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The case revolved around a road traffic accident that had taken place in Germany in late 2009. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am by Milena Sterio
”  According to the complain, the territoriality requirement has been met in this case, because both defendants are American citizens and reside in the United States, because the defendants devised their torture plan in the United States, because they supervised and implemented the plan from the United States, and because the ill-treatment of the three detainees took place while they were held at United… [read post]