Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 7801 - 7820 of 191,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 5:51 am by INFORRM
In addition the recent decision of AB v Ministry of Justice ([2014] EWHC 1847 (QB)) following Halliday v Creation Consumer Finance Ltd (2013) EWCA Civ 333 have allowed compensation under the Data Protection Act 1998 for distress under s.13(2) of the Act where only nominal damages have been awarded in relation to the financial loss aspect of the claim under s.13(1). [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The notice requirement, itself, had been confirmed in Frits Loendersloot v George Ballantine & Sons Ltd [1977] ECR I-227. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by Dave
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by Dave
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Earlier this month, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down judgment in Mouvement Raelien Suisse v Switzerland (Application no.16354/06). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:06 am by Neil Cahn
The entire area may have been turned on its head in 2010 by the Court of Appeals in Fields v. [read post]