Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 7801 - 7820 of 15,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2014, 6:24 am by Ronald Mann
To underscore how impressive the Public Citizen brief was, it bears noting that the Supreme Court previously decided another case, Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council 26/9 Elaboration of an international legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights The Human Rights Council,Recalling the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations, Recalling also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Recalling… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The decision (which you can access here) is Case C-119/10 (Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
Drink and drugs were the main preoccupation of some of Europe's finest legal brains this morning, when the Court of First Instance rendered its decision in Case Tâ€'234/06, Giampietro Torresan v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Klosterbrauerei Weissenohe GmbH & Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm by nyinjuries
But a Chinese bearing manufacturer, RTR Bearing, offered to fabricate a replacement bearing in China for approximately $20,000, with an estimated delivery time of three months. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
Under plain error analysis, the defendant bears the burden of demonstrating `not only that there was error, but that absent the error, the jury probably would have reached a different result.' State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:50 am by Mark Murakami
  This case was ostensibly about the right to bear arms under the 2nd Amendment and the several states ability to infringe upon those rights. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Court noted on the issue of fair dealing the result was the same as in the Department of Finance case: It bears repeating, nevertheless, that as stated by the Supreme Court in CCH, the fair dealing in a case like ours requires that the dealing is for the purpose of research, and that it be fair (para 50). [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:39 pm by Series of Essays
But after Kisor, directions for judicial review of agency own-rule interpretation bear scant resemblance to Auer deference. [read post]