Search for: "J. C." Results 7801 - 7820 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
Arnold J's ruling is noted by the IPKat here, and the original decision by the Hearing Officer, the seasoned Allan James, is here; the IPKat hosted a guest comment on this decision by young barrister Katherine Moggridge here. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:25 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
However, his medical records indicated prior injuries that were never disclosed to Syncrude; (c) In cross-examination, Saunders said he could not recall using cocaine despite an entry by Dr. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Mann J rejected this submission, preferring the “layered” approach urged on him by the Claimants. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Thanks to the usual competence and efficiency of the Supreme Court Historical Society, Kevin J. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
 Before Arnold J, it was common ground that the word "for" in claims such as those in the patent were to be understood as "suitable and intended for". [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm by Jeremy
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:23 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Florida Supreme Court has ordered a 30-day suspension without pay of a judge The violation of the [j]udicial [c]anons in this matter arises from Judge Krause’s single incident of participating in her husband’s judicial campaign. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:41 am
§ 284;g) declaring the '676 patent is directly infringed by Defendant;h) declaring Defendant's infringement of the '676 patent has been willful;i) declaring Defendant be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from manufacturing, using, selling and offering to sell the infringing products in the United States prior to the expiration of the '676 patent;j) awarding damages adequate to compensate Plaintiff for Defendant's infringement of the '676 patent… [read post]