Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 7801 - 7820 of 15,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Dean Freeman
This is actually a low estimated, with other researchers suggesting the figures are closer to the ratio cited in the general population: 1 in 10. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
 This is a practical issue, answered Max: if the goods are consumer goods, we'd go for a low level of protectability and focus on the average European consumer -- but if we were to take the case from the perspective of an author's work, we'd have to ask if this was a work of the author's original creativity, as in the Court of Justice ruling in Case C-5/08 Infopaq. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:53 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Just before his ouster, Danon filed a whistleblower action, State of New York ex rel David Danon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm by Jason M. Halper
The Court observed that the deal represented a negative premium (referred to by Comverge’s largest stockholder as a “takeunder”), and the board had rejected as too low an offer of $2.25/share offer from HIG (28% higher than the merger value) a little over a month earlier. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:11 pm by Jon Gelman
Today's post is shared from insurancejournal.com/The Florida Supreme Court is considering whether to declare the state’s workers’ compensation attorney fee schedule unconstitutional.The court recently heard oral arguments in a case (Castellanos v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
The Guardian reports that the country’s already-flagging economy has been buffeted recently by Western sanctions and low oil prices. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
 The judge recorded:counsel pointed out that I had held in Actavis v Lilly at [112] that, in principle, a limitation made to a claim to avoid an objection of lack of clarity could be relied on as aid to construction. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
" This is a pretty low hurdle, and likely covers many employment arbitration agreements. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer’s motion was granted on his claims alleging a failure to accommodate and to engage in the interactive process because it was undisputed that he was granted his requested accommodation (Moore v. [read post]