Search for: "Mark Washington"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 14,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 5:30 pm
– Washington, DC lawyer Eve K. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
They will check as to whether the proposed mark is "confusingly similar" to any prior registered mark, and may deny the application if it is. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Washington, D.C. - The opinion in Blackhorse v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) just wrote another chapter in the long-running battle over the registration of the Washington Redskins trademarks. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Gekko’s guilty plea marks another event in a wide-ranging series of prosecutions related to Loomis Wealth Solutions, a wealth-building program offered to the public in California, Illinois, Washington, and elsewhere from 2006 through 2008. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
[Washington Post poll, 19 June 2014]No. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
If the mark has a descriptive meaning, the owner of the trademark can’t prevent others from using the mark in its primary descriptive sense. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
The registrations in question were all obtained between 1967 and 1990 on behalf of the Washington NFL franchise, and are all word marks. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
It passed a resolution in 1993 where it corroborated a 1972 meeting with the President of the NCAI and the then Owner of the Washington Redskins. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:25 pm
To show the first element (the meaning of the mark as its used), the Board showed the team from Washington's usage of the mark (and how it maintained a Native American meaning). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:30 pm
It was a big day for commentary of the big Washington Redskins trademark decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:04 pm
UPDATE: Tip from the TTABlog: Marks are not cancelled. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:46 pm
By: Sheri Mason The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision today cancelling six of the Washington Redskins’ registered trademarks, finding that the marks disparage Native Americans. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:43 pm
The Washington Appellants? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:29 am
From the New York Post comes news that the controversial Washington Redskins trade mark registrations have been cancelled. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
County of Union has some very important things to say about the lack of protection for marks under sec. 43(a) when those marks are not registrable under sec. 2.Also, a picture from my collection: I got this from a yard sale; the guy who made them was forced to discontinue them due to threats from the team. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
An exclusion of marks that disparage groups while allowing marks that praise those groups strikes me as viewpoint discrimination. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
(TTAB Cancellation No. 92046185) Today, the USPTO granted the cancellation of a group of trademark registrations that all include the term “Redskins” and that are owned by The Washington Redskins. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:38 am
<> UN officials call for restoration of ecosystems to reduce climate change disasters - Marking the World Day to Combat Desertification, United Nations officials today emphasized the importance of restoring degrading lands to avoid or soften the potentially disastrous impacts of climate change. . . [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
Washington Post: New Federal Laws Help, But Still Don't Fully Protect Native American Women From Violence President Obama toured the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota on Friday, marking his first visit to Indian Country since his 2008 campaign—and... [read post]
