Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 12,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the rejection of the sound and stated in its reasoning that the sign was not 'catchy' enough to stand out from the already existing jingles and did not fulfil the origin function of a trade mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:28 am
For instance, the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
See Davis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Under the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in 2015 in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in M.Karunanidhi v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Researchers in the field had little idea whic [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm
” Davis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:17 pm
: The Field v Google; Righthaven v Jan Klerks (PlagiarismToday) Radio, RIAA: mandatory FM radio in cell phones is the future (ArsTechnica) (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (1709 Blog) (ArsTechnica) Breaking down the DMCA exemptions, Pt. 2: Free your phone and the rest will follow? [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:12 am
Sys., LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am
Continued United States leadership in the global financial system will sustain United States financial power and promote United States economic interests. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Fields, No. 07-10384 The denial of Defendant's motion to vacate his drug sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed, where Defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an Apprendi objection that the Court of Appeals had previously rejected. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Handelman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
July 24, 2015); and most recently, Stevens v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:06 am
From Sooy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
The most recent case to tackle this issue is the case of Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
” State Laws Forcing Publishers to License Ebooks to Libraries Are Unlawful [PDF] — A new white paper from Free State Foundation explains, “As the District Court in AAP v. [read post]
