Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7801 - 7820
of 37,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 12:56 am
Under the CJEU's decision Huawei/ZTE [C-170/13, here], the potential abuse is "bringing an action for infringement seeking an injunction prohibiting the infringement of [a] patent". [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
[C.] [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:28 am
Wilson’s report of August 31, 2018.CFTC’s motion to compel Kraft/Mondelez to produce deposition transcripts and exhibits from the related private civil case of Ploss v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
OGD Equipment Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
First, the proposal states that “consumer-facing” businesses are the focus. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
Impeachment is nonjusticiable as it “involve[s] a political question that c[an] not be resolved by the courts. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Disclaimers: not really something to bother with anymore under EU trade mark law Patent-och v Mats Hansson Case C-705/17, CJEU (June 2019) A disclaimer is an odd thing: “it is part of my mark, but please ignore it”. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
The CJEU’s Planet49 Ruling The Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Planet49 GmbH (Case C-673/17) focused on a promotional lottery that Planet49 ran on its website. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
The CJEU’s Planet49 Ruling The Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Planet49 GmbH (Case C-673/17) focused on a promotional lottery that Planet49 ran on its website. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
Digging deeper to protect tribal property interests: United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The Basic Lesson of Feinberg v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
