Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7801 - 7820
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 6:48 pm
Hislop at para 53, and R. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am
The court was prepared to accept that a section 8 notice was a demand for rent (citing C Y Property Mangement Ltd v Babalola. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
The issue as to whether WIAL is an Investor and whether there was Investment depends on answering of five questions: “(a) does White qualify as “Investor”; (b) where a contractual right is relied upon to establish an “investment, must the contract create rights in rem; (c) do White’s rights under the Contract qualify as “investment”; (d) do White’s rights under the Bank Guarantees qualify as an… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
” Distinguishing State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
According to AG Sharpston, the correct interpretation should be that Article 5(2)(b) allows Member States to choose whether and to what extent fair compensation should be provided for where technological measures are availab [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
The “confusion test” – Sections 12(1)(d) and 16(3)(a) and (b) Section 12(1)(d) states that a mark is registrable if it is not confusing with a registered trademark; sections 16(3)(a) and (b) very similarly provided that a mark must not be confusing with a trademark that had previously been know or applied for. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 8:04 pm
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion's judge decision on the basis that a go-kart was not an automoblie pursant to section 224(1) in Part VI of the Insurance Act, R.S.O., 1990, c I.8.Here is the case citation: Adams v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:11 am
House Minority Whip Christopher B. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States, 15-6418, immediately found itself Dancing with the Big Boys on the Court’s merits docket. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Code § 33-6-31(b) where it states that “[n]o sums payable as a result of underinsured motorists’ coverage shall be reduced by payments made under the insured’s policy or any other policy. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Kelly 147,100 150,000 0 102 297,202 Jon C. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
§6664(c). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
§ 7.27(c); vi. transformation of an extension of protection to the United States into a U.S. application under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:47 am
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Shoop v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:39 am
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
