Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 7801 - 7820 of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:19 pm by Andis Kaulins
The first part, 32 National Reports, is an overview of the existing legal and administrative practices in the Member States, EEA countries and Candidate Countries, with regard to the treatment of electronic documents in e-Commerce transactions. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by lsammis
Deposition of Fran Greifenberger on July 7th, 2011, in relation to State v. [read post]
 Change of ownership does not distinguish between (i) a transfer of ownership interests among investors and other equity holders and (ii) the issu [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Holder, the 2013 case that narrowed the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In what amounts to an interest-free loan from the rest of us to large property holders, rich people under current law can see their fortunes rise, but so long as they do not sell their shares for cash, they never have to pay tax. [read post]
 Change of ownership does not distinguish between (i) a transfer of ownership interests among investors and other equity holders and (ii) the issu [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In what amounts to an interest-free loan from the rest of us to large property holders, rich people under current law can see their fortunes rise, but so long as they do not sell their shares for cash, they never have to pay tax. [read post]
 Change of ownership does not distinguish between (i) a transfer of ownership interests among investors and other equity holders and (ii) the iss [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
Biogen Idec (App. 2006-1643, -1649), on remand from the Supreme Court after Bilski v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
Biogen Idec (App. 2006-1643, -1649), on remand from the Supreme Court after Bilski v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]