Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 16,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
To this date Emil remains in a vegetative state. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:56 am
The ABA literally forced an unwilling law school to engage in preferential admissions, in violation of Grutter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
Read the Republican lawmakers' brief here: U S v Farley Amicus Brief.pdf [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
From SSRN:Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 11:01 am
In Miller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
That's the question recently considered by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Al Minor & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:55 am
In Justice v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Davis, Professor of Law, American University, Washington College of Law The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a jailhouse strip search of a man who was wrongfully arrested for a minor offense in Florence v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 7:01 am
In one, DH et al v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 4:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Waco Tribune-Herald by Cindy V. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
Elrod v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
” Lulay v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
