Search for: "State v. Save" Results 7801 - 7820 of 11,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, it is unsatisfactory and dangerous to rely on the common sense of state officials to save overly broad and ill defined legislation. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by Nicolas Croquet
Instead, Member States would have to fix in advance indicative national energy efficiency targets in the form of absolute levels of primary energy consumption (i.e., gross inland consumption) in 2020. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
A ‘sentencing’ heuristic is not strictly necessary to save ICC resources. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm by zshapiro
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by abiinniss
These were termed informal means of dispute resolution, since they did not receive state sanction and were largely ignored as a creole cultural idea which had little to do with the proper regulation of society. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Joe Palazzolo
The average dropped to 56% in the period from 1982 to 1999, and no more than no more than six justices ever attended, save for two of the addresses. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:31 am by E. Alexandra "Sasha" Golden
There is a substantial distinction in the State's insistence that human life be saved where the affliction is curable, as opposed to the State interest where, as here, the issue is not whether, but when, for how long, and at what cost to the individual that life may be briefly extended. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Tom Smith
In Lochner's vacant place, I hereby recommend one such zero-arguments-for case, Griswold v. [read post]