Search for: "State v. State"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 258,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell,… [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:55 pm
Sanchelima v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 12:00 am
United States on SSRN. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:45 am
Congressional Research Service, The Potential Federal Tax Implications of United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
Earlier in the week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:45 am
"The vanishing constitutional issue in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:20 pm
Virginia State Bar. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:03 am
United States which illustrates estate tax... [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:33 pm
We have previously blogged (here and here) about Tuaua v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
(Orin Kerr) I’m about to head off to teach an 11am class about the reasonable expectation of privacy test, using the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
The University of New Mexico School of Law and the UNM Indian Law Program present Montana v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
As readers have no doubt not forgotten, an eight Justice Court is weighing the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
The court of appeals held this week in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:54 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:50 am
Congressional Research Service, The Potential Federal Tax Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:20 am
” As a result of the state’s ban that followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 5:17 am
This latest decision is Newfield Exploration Company, et al v. [read post]
