Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7801 - 7820 of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
For example, if a state provides appellate review for criminal cases, as all fifty states do, indigents have a right to appeal without paying the costs. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Pete Strom
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Special Term holds that the guardian had established a strong likelihood that he would ultimately succeed in proving that his wards had a constitutionally-protected right to live, that they would be irreparably damaged if a preliminary injunction were denied and that a balancing of the equities was clearly in favor of the unborn infants. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:37 am by Joy Waltemath
And although there was no direct indication that he had authority over her hiring, firing, promotions, compensation, or benefits, the statement that he was a manager and husband to the mother of the owner was enough under Vance v Ball State Univ. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
The Second Circuit, for instance, held that Rule 9(b) requires fraud complaints to allege facts that lead to a “strong inference” that the defendant has the requisite state of mind even though Rule 9(b) provides that conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally, see, e.g., IKB International v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
ACSblog discusses the split among state courts about how to interpret the Court’s ruling last Term in Caperton v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Hurles, 12-1472, gets lucky relist number thirteen, and at this rate will still be going strong for the Pyeongchang Olympics; the petition asks whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm by INFORRM
Their involvement was clearly stated on the front page of the Court of Appeal judgment and they must be concerned about the potential damage to their reputation so casually inflicted by Hain’s action. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]