Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 7801 - 7820
of 8,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Holliston, MA; Lawrence Sloane, President) B&T Fire Sprinkler Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Yale Sec., Inc., 986 F.2d 1020, 1025 (6th Cir 1993)). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
The property owners have filed their merits brief in the beachfront takings case, Stop the Beachfront Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
(Afro-IP) Canada Canada – General Canadian i4i, Inc wins abroad, but is there any protection at home? [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., No 0108002818 (Pa. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:26 am
See z4 Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
Metabolite Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:49 am
Sonomedica, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:55 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
United Int'l Holdings, Inc., 532 U.S. 588, 121 S. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:46 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), and Cooper v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The court's statement in Religious Technology Center v Lerma (1995) was also cited in argument of the danger of granting prior restraints in copyright cases such as this as being unconstitutional:"If a threat to national security was insufficient to warrant a prior restraint in New York Times Co. v United States, the threat to plaintiff's copyrights and trade secrets is woefully inadequate. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
See Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:52 am
Likewise, in United States Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
After oral argument in this case, other judges from this court addressed that question in another case - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
" (ellipsis in original) (quoting United States v. [read post]
