Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
Regents of the University of California comes from Naaz Modan at Education Dive. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
But claim 8, which is the one that matters in the first California Apple v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:34 am
His conviction was affirmed last month in State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
Texas might lose two House seats; and California might lose as many as three. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:41 pm
This week, perhaps emboldened by the Supreme Court's recent decision, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California permitted a federal takings claim to proceed despite plaintiffs' failure to pursue a takings claim in State court. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Galang, supra.The Court of Appeals begins the opinion, as courts usually do, by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:In 2004, the female victim came to the United States from the Philippines. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
In particular, the Huawei v Conversant judgment has high similarity with Huawei v Samsung judgment rendered by the California Northern District Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:04 pm
Because it interferes with the United States' "broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration," Arizona v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:42 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:08 pm
In California v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:29 pm
United States [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 2:25 am
Bollinger and California v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:01 pm
Since implementation of the new safety standards, California’s reported cases of V. vulnificus have dropped to nearly zero. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:07 pm
The United States Constitution seems to support that, as well. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
State, 367 Md. 348, 353, 787 A.2d 152, 155 (2001), “‘[c]omment upon a defendant’s failure to testify in a criminal trial was prohibited in Maryland before the United States Supreme Court, in Griffin v. [read post]
