Search for: "United States v. House" Results 7801 - 7820 of 12,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” She added that “in this land of liberty, it is indisputable that current and former employees of the White House work for the People of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
The Assisted Dying Bill [Lords] was given a second reading without division and committed to a Committee of the whole House. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:29 am by admin
NEW YORK—The Justice Department alleged May 3 a wholly owned Deutsche Bank AG subsidiary fraudulently misrepresented its mortgage lending and underwriting practices for years while participating in a federal mortgage-insurance program that to date has led to $386 million in losses (United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm by mrlibrarian
The concept of eminent domain came to the forefront in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
In the United States, legal limits on prisoner isolation are largely the product of litigation, whereas the Canadian scheme arrived through legislation. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
” By contrast, she observed that her favorite decisions were United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:14 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In the foundational separation-of-powers case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Broekman: Telling Boxes—Towards a Kevelson Archive12.30 – 14.00:  Lunch in the Katz Hall14.00 – 14.45: Larry Catà Backer: Legal Semiotics and Political Practice: The Semiotics of a One-Party System14.45 – 15.30: Meghann Garrett: From Intellectual Property Attorney to In-House Council—A Change in Perspective15.30 – 15.45: Tea/Coffee Break15.45 – 16.45: Alan C. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm by Sophia Cope
Additionally, we will be interested to see whether and how the revised policy addresses two key cases that have come down since 2009: the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s 2013 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:11 am by Florian Mueller
There's probably no appeals court in the whole wide world that hears more attempts to monopolize functionality than the Federal Circuit, which hears all patent infringement and validity appeals in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am by Patricia Hughes
The House of Commons recognized Quebecers as a “nation” in 2006: “That this House recognize that the Québécois form a nation within a united Canada. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States Supreme Court passed on a case about a similar issue back in 2016, American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Paul (1969) held that this term includes "recreational areas" and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]