Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 21,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The central revenue feature of Ohio House Bill 66 of 2005 (which was also the biennial budget), the Commercial Activity Tax was designed to phase in as corporation franchise and tangible personal property taxes phased out. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
See Eldred v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 11:19 am
” Balsamo v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:02 am
Lawyers with contingency-fee role in AGs’ carbon campaign join Hagens Berman [Scott Flaherty, American Lawyer; earlier on climate lawyers on contingency fee here and here] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, 2008, includes entries on urban planning by Mark Pennington and on eminent domain and takings by Karol Boudreaux; California legislature’s $1.5 billion green Christmas tree includes bill “aimed at helping a union looking to organize workers who assemble Tesla electric… [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 3:11 pm
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:38 am
(For a recent example of a rescue, see People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am
Your medical bills are astronomical. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am
Your medical bills are astronomical. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:24 pm
Under U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 10:54 pm
The SJC decision stems from a February 2013 arrest by state police of a driver who was stopped for allegedly driving with his head lights off; the name of the case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
NCSLT Litigation Moratorium? – Expect confusion, inconsistent implementation, and need for follow-up
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm
Much rather, the implementation and impact will necessarily differ from state to state because lawsuits cannot necessarily just be put on hold unilaterally. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:03 am
Porrino (State Recognition of Tribes)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:03 am
Porrino (State Recognition of Tribes)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 7:57 am
Porrino (State Recognition of Tribes)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
I thought I was in the wrong state. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:26 pm
State v. [read post]
