Search for: "C A WILLIAMS" Results 7821 - 7840 of 8,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 3:08 am
Along those lines, the biggest problem that the 2007 club faces is that 4/9's of the lineup most days will include veterans C Ausmus, SS Everett, fading Hall-of-Famer Craig Biggio and the pitcher. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 3:02 pm
" Military Commissions Act, section 949b(a)(C).So far as I know, the military judge never ruled on this motion. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
" The approximately 40 searches detailed by a forensic computer examiner called by the prosecution occurred on three occasions in the weeks leading up to William McGuire's disappearance. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:57 am
"Analysing Advergames: Active Diversions or Actually Deception" STEPHAN DAHL, LYNNE C. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:30 am
Hughes of the Eastern District.He said Judge John Paul was named by President Chester Arthur in 1893 and served until 1901 at which time Judge Henry C. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
"[C]riminologists and law enforcement officials testifying before the [Sentencing] Commission have noted that retail-level drug traffickers are readily replaced by new drug sellers so long as the demand for a drug remains high. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:31 am
" More from today's editorial:[C]ommunity colleges elsewhere tend to fall to the bottom of the education funding food chain - after K-12 schools and higher ed. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
Judges aren't granting community supervision in the most egregious cases, but leaving them the discretion to make judgment calls about punishment serves the interests of justice, where this bill's rigid sentencing harms those interests, not to mention worsens prison overcrowding.Closing search warrant affidavits about PR, not justiceHB 1011 by Riddle is another bad bill, a companion to SB 244 by Williams in the Senate. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Climate Change in the 21st C. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
Cotus", who rounded-up several worthy comments on the 2d Amendment case and concluded with some observations of his own: "[C]onsidering that the 2-1 panel had to bridge several issues that they considered close . . . it is problematic to say that this result is based on the "plain language" of the constitution. [read post]