Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 7821 - 7840 of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2020, 10:49 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Learning will fall into three main categories: Writing: Work with Associate Editors to monitor national security and foreign policy developments, and 4-5 times per week, co-write “Today’s Headlines and Commentary”; work with Associate Editors to co-write “The Week that Will Be,” a weekly feature that outlines upcoming events, academic announcements, and employment announcements; work with the Associate Editor to co-write a deep-dive analytical… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:44 am
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., No. 07-308 The plain language of 26 U.S.C. sections 7422(a) and 6511 requires a taxpayer seeking a refund for a tax assessed in violation of the Export Clause, just as for any other unlawfully assessed tax, to file a timely administrative refund claim before bringing suit against the government. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:15 pm
" Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:44 am by Cassie J. Edgar
Cassie is also Co-Chair of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice group. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
Hardback, ISBN 978 1 84720 360 1. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:34 pm by Gene Takagi
’” This Act will take effect in Maryland on October 1, 2010.The initial Maryland legislation was co-drafted by B Lab, a non-profit organization, and William H. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:28 am by Neil Cahn
§240(1-b)(b)(5), income for support purposes shall mean, but shall not be limited to, the sum of the amounts determined by the application of clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) of that sub-paragraph, reduced by the amount determined by the application of clause (vii) of that sub-paragraph. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am by Don Cruse
But that would mean two court proceedings, in some sense, racing toward final judgment and creating a different kind of risk of inconsistent judgments. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Will Bland
  The Court found that the data in question put the median ratio for the entire gamut a less than 1:1, meaning that the compensatory award, in most cases, exceeds the punitive award. [read post]