Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 7821 - 7840 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2020, 8:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
A recent decision of a Human Rights Adjudication Panel, T.M. v Manitoba (Justice), 2019 MBHR 13 (CanLII) has clarified the extent of an employer’s obligation to provide its employees with a safe and respectful workplace. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Because libel was a common-law tort, state courts could easily preserve a constitutionally narrowed form of civil libel action just by adapting state tort law rules to fit the Court's emerging libel caselaw, and doing so with each new Court decision. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:10 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
A lack of resources given the volume seen in the Superior Court has. caused everything to slow down to a stall. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Judge Alex Manning is a Judicial Officer in the Family Division of the Superior Court of Fulton County. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:16 am by Broc Romanek
The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that Section 5.2(a)(v) of the merger agreement was an unreasonable defensive measure. [read post]
  Sweeney subsequently initiated two separate actions challenging the orders in Solano County Superior Court. [read post]
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
I know, I'm sorry does not repair the mess I made but, that's all I've got. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
I've written recently - and not so recently - about how the law deals with people who "annoy, alarm and harass" each other, but that post, and an earlier one, were both about adult conduct.Magistrate Marcia Linsky of the Allen County (Indiana) Superior Court sent me a link to a recent opinion from the Indiana Supreme Court that deals with a very different kind of harassment. . . harassment by a middle school student. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:04 am by Dan Pinnington
In considering the motion, the court applied the following two-part test for whether a lawyer should be disqualified due to a conflict of interest, articulated in MacDonald Estate v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:35 pm by Dan Pinnington
In considering the motion, the court applied the following two-part test for whether a lawyer should be disqualified due to a conflict of interest, articulated in MacDonald Estate v. [read post]