Search for: "In re David T." Results 7821 - 7840 of 13,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 2:06 pm by Elie Mystal
David Lat argued: “I actually think it’s very fitting that Bristow be placed on this panel. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:21 am by Matthew Lister
One other significant difference between the normal peer-reviewed journals and the law review is that the law review didn’t have the option of recommending “revise and re-submit”. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:21 am by Broc Romanek
And depressing as David did what he was supposed to do and they're continuing to put him through the ringer... [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:44 am by Patrick Maines
This said, we’re always on the lookout for those people who view this matter differently, even where they represent only the most marginal points of view. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:03 pm by By Erik Lundegaard
In the upcoming issue of New York Metro Super Lawyers magazine, we interview David M. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:06 pm by Ted Brooks
If you’re trying a case, you shouldn’t be concerned with how the technology works (or doesn’t work). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm by WIMS
We're dramatically overregulating every aspect of the private sector in our country and now we're threatening to raise taxes on top of it. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Stating that "[t]his Court addressed that very issue in Blue Chip . . . a case with very similar facts," the majority concludes that "we are compelled to act with the same uncompromising rigidity here as in Blue Chip. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
We’re the good guys; they are the bad guys. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 6:00 pm
Castellanos said: [T]he president is running, I think, a very strange campaign for re-election. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm by Keith Gerver
David Barron kicks off the last panel discussion of the conference, focusing on the Presidency in the Post-9/11 World. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:35 pm by admin
” But likewise, Scher said, employees shouldn’t think they can just post anything about their job situation. [read post]