Search for: "John Doe T"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 22,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 3:45 am
"[T]he record simply is devoid of any evidence showing a specific and consistent plan to resume use during a period of ten years. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:33 am
[Doesn't this make the prima facie patent evidence conclusive, if the Board will not consider applicant's evidence? [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:54 am
Discrimination You’re Damned if You Fire an Employee Who Takes FMLA Leave, Even if She Does Not Return After 12 Weeks — via damnedif I’m A F….ing Idiot To Let A Pregnant Girl Work Behind The Bar — via FisherBroyles Trump: If you’re bullied, get over it — via Minding the Workplace “Too cute” yoga instructor loses her sex bias claim against her Playboy Playmate boss — via Eric Meyer’s… [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
” There is no computer in his office; he barely ever uses one and doesn’t have an email address. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
[Doesn't opposer have the burden of proof? [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 3:13 am
[Sorry - had to give the Beatles equal time].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:06 am
Despite a lengthy discussion of the CSA and the Farm Bills, the Board declined to reach the unlawful use refusal based on violation of the CSA.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: More bad trademark news for the cannabis industry.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
Ted Cruz (also educated at our finest elite schools) memorized the Constitution and won't a word of criticism of it (though I suspect he does not in fact support slavery, as the 1787 Constitution did without using the magic word). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:26 am
According to State spokesman John Kirby, "[W]e don't share the broad assessment that there's a lax culture here at the State Department when it comes to dealing with classified information. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 3:00 am
***If "formal barriers in fact existed and were operative against [the] plaintiff in the first action," however, “it is unfair to preclude” a litigant from bringing a second action relying on new theories or seeking new relief and the general rule does not apply. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 7:30 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:01 am
Meacham does not analyze the repercussions of this type of populism. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
Access a fact sheet "What the Bill Actually Does and Does Not"(click here). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:53 pm
John Stewart are you following this guy? [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Historically, the courts have also recognized that the legal process does not apply in the same fashion to the president, as it does to other government officials. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
His concurrence was joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
[I agree, except I also think w/the concurrences that the Court can’t possibly mean what it says; if it does, then the 1A is Lochner and regulation is basically over. [read post]
