Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 21,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 11:49 am
To invoke the family purpose doctrine, Baseluos Law Firm works to demonstrate that the owner defendant 1) maintained control and ownership of the vehicle; 2) utilized the vehicle for family activities; 3) the negligent driver was a member of the owner’s family; 4) the driver was using the vehicle at the time for a family purpose; and 5) the owner gave his consent for the use. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:49 am
To invoke the family purpose doctrine, Baseluos Law Firm works to demonstrate that the owner defendant 1) maintained control and ownership of the vehicle; 2) utilized the vehicle for family activities; 3) the negligent driver was a member of the owner’s family; 4) the driver was using the vehicle at the time for a family purpose; and 5) the owner gave his consent for the use. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:49 am
To invoke the family purpose doctrine, Baseluos Law Firm works to demonstrate that the owner defendant 1) maintained control and ownership of the vehicle; 2) utilized the vehicle for family activities; 3) the negligent driver was a member of the owner’s family; 4) the driver was using the vehicle at the time for a family purpose; and 5) the owner gave his consent for the use. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:49 am
To invoke the family purpose doctrine, Baseluos Law Firm works to demonstrate that the owner defendant 1) maintained control and ownership of the vehicle; 2) utilized the vehicle for family activities; 3) the negligent driver was a member of the owner’s family; 4) the driver was using the vehicle at the time for a family purpose; and 5) the owner gave his consent for the use. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
The jury found the church 80% liable, the ministry organization 15% liable, and the plaintiff 5% liable for the incident. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
In addition, the night club was found to be vicariously liable for the manager’s conduct. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
It’s All in the Pleading [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Or let’s put that a different way. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
Suppose a patent case in which defendant has infringed plaintiff's valid patent. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
Can you try such a case without bifurcating the duty to defend and the bad-faith claims? [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:36 am
The Federal Circuit has affirmed the Court of International Trade's holding that a surety is be liable for statutory interest but not for equitable interest when the importer defaults on the payment of antidumping duties. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The judge also properly rejected Saad’s forum non conveniens defense on the grounds that there was no hardship: “Here, defendant bears no hardship, since there is nothing to defend. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:39 am
The defendants are not liable for the punitive damages assessed against any other defendantNew Jersey limits the amount of punitive damages a jury can award, but the judge and attorneys are not allowed to tell the jury about the cap. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:18 pm
The Defendant, after being pressed for disclosure, provided “a screenshot taken from ICBC’s records of the particulars of the defendant’s insurance in effect at the time of the accident”. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 4:33 am
If a doctor fails to conduct the tests needed to obtain an accurate view of a patient’s health or neglects to advise them of the risks associated with a proposed course of care, however, the patient’s condition may worsen, and the doctor may be liable for medical malpractice. [read post]
9 May 2009, 3:36 pm
It can also be difficult to find evidence that the defendant had constructive knowledge. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:20 am
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, the court allowed the plaintiff’s case to proceed against the defendant manufacturer even though the asbestos-containing part causing the plaintiff’s injuries was not manufactured by the defendant. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
As such, the defendant was not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:10 pm
EFF along with the Center for Internet and Society Cyberlaw Clinic at Stanford University Law School co-sponsored a website at DirecTVDefense.org "to help people defend themselves," saying, "People who intercept DirecTV's satellite signal are breaking the law. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:08 am
Another reason it can matter is that joint employers may be held jointly and severally liable. [read post]
