Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 18,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 9:34 pm
And because this argument covers both licensor and supplier defendants, the court sua sponte dismissed the same claims against the supplier defendants. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:51 am
The ACPA is broad enough to cover this practice, provided it can be shown that the misspelled domain name is confusingly similar to the plaintiff’s trademark. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
(Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Hal Wegner) (IP Updates) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) US: Oral arguments completed in Tafas, GSK v Dudas (Hal Wegner) (Patent Prospector) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Kudos to Mark for his excellent and well written review. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 12:25 pm
Aaron Robinson, one of the named Defendants in the adverse-possession dispute we covered earlier this morning, [Where Do Your Park Your Canoe?] [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
Some brokers use bench-marking (i.e., comparing companies of the same size to see what the “the other guy” buys). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:16 am
Covered Lists refer to the contents of the data sold, “including the data card, all available solicitations whose respondents’ names and/or demographic information appear within the Covered List[.] [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of undisclosed structures’:… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:09 am
In a footnote, the court also discussed a theory developed in detail in Sara Stadler Nelson, The Wages of Ubiquity in Trademark Law, 88 Iowa Law Review 732 (2003): “any dilution by blurring that might occur here is due to Hasbro’s excessive licensing of its Transformers and Transformers related marks to over 800 licensees covering 11,000 different products. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
Like in many jurisdictions, Rebecca stated that the damages awarded by courts may not enough to cover legal costs of the claimant. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Registrar of Trade-marks (IPblog) $45 per student in Canada v. $3.75 per student in the USA? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
– three executives suspended for suspected industrial espionage (IPKat) Germany Federal Supreme Court: Employee inventor rights: Steuervorrichtung (Control Device) (EPLAW) Federal Patent Court decides subsidiarity principle also applicable to European patents and opposition proceedings: Fahrzeugsteuer (Vehicle Tax) (EPLAW) Bundesgerichtshof on registrability of device mark for ‘Hefteinband’ (booklet cover) (Class 46) German Federal Patent Court: MAR Y SOL valid… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
(German © law would not cover the Hard Rock logo, which he used.) [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Arbitrary marks work better when a story can connect the underlying good/service. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 12:00 am
I also covered 7 common holes in retirement plans. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
A face shield may be used in addition to, but not as a substitute for, a face covering. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm
The final rule reduces the scope of its safeguarding requirements and limits the application of safeguarding controls to unclassified controlled technical information, which is marked in accordance with DoD Instruction 5230.24, Distribution Statements on Technical Documents. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:08 pm
So I can’t imagine what it was like for Mark Lindquist (linked above) when he was literally impaled by a piece of metal and his company’s carrier, Accident Fund Insurance, refused to pay his medical bill. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
The “mother case” is Marks v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:30 am
President Obama performed dramatically better among whites than Kerry in the covered states of Virginia and (partially covered) North Carolina, both of which he won – and dramatically less well than Kerry in Arkansas, although Section 5 does not cover Arkansas. [read post]
