Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 7821 - 7840 of 57,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 9:11 pm
The Court determined that because the defendant's obligation to identify himself arose from a state statute, and because the statute satisfied the Fourth Amendment constitutional standards, “[t]he principles of Terry permit[ted] a State to require a suspect to disclose his name in the course of a Terry stop. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Absent some allegation of aesthetic similarity to another’s advertisement, a claim that defendant infringed a trademark does not itself comprise a claim for trade dress infringement. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 3:46 am
The Court concluded "no", and thus  the action of the defendants did not constitute infringement. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” They also used Darger’s name, identity, and likeness to “exploit” his works and by registering the domain name “officialhenrydarger.com. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:25 pm
ICANN’T Help Myself: Beneficial Adjustments to the New Generic Top-Leve Domain Name Expansion Process By Brandon Marsh The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently implemented a generic top-level domain name (gTLD) expansion process. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
Because Officer Finnerty lacked probable cause to search the defendant, his search of the defendant was unlawful and the evidence obtained therefrom, namely, the marijuana, cash, and cellular telephone, must be suppressed. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Defendant gave a false name in response to an unlawful stop because there was no reason to stop the defendant’s car. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:27 pm by Arfaa Law Group
Namely, absent that expert testimony, the plaintiff was unable to present a prima facie case of medical malpractice. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Still, it is not clear from the judgment whether the plaintiff has to first show a prima facie case that the defendant’s conscience has been impacted, before the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut that presumption. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's claim of negligent supervision was based on, among other things, Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, an agency of  State of New York [collectively "Defendants"]  alleged failure to properly supervise its employees by allowing acts and words of retaliation against her following her report of patient abuse by another supervisor and her assistance in the investigation of that abuse.Following a trial, a jury found in plaintiff's favor on… [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's claim of negligent supervision was based on, among other things, Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, an agency of  State of New York [collectively "Defendants"]  alleged failure to properly supervise its employees by allowing acts and words of retaliation against her following her report of patient abuse by another supervisor and her assistance in the investigation of that abuse.Following a trial, a jury found in plaintiff's favor on… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:58 pm
Two parties were originally named as defendants because the plaintiff did not realize that two individuals, referred to in the accident report were one and the same person. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:15 am by Daniel Richardson
Miles, a delusional defendant told a nurse in a mental health facility that he wanted to kill “someone named Bill from Evergreen” because “earth goddess” had told him it was okay. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
Plaintiff argues that “[a]n overwhelming majority of consumers think of the CRAYOLA mark without prompting when asked to name a brand of crayons. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:16 pm
Practice Tip: Microsoft has named as defendants both the business entity and the individual who has been identified as related to Mister HardDrive as "an owner, operator, officer, [or] shareholder, [who] does business as and/or otherwise controls" the business. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
 Against this background, there was nothing to suggest that a UK or EU consumer was targeted by the defendants’ services. [read post]