Search for: "People v. House"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 12,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Low (Legal Adviser to the Scotch Whisky Association) reports delightedly that Scotland got there first back in July 2008 when Ladies Paton, Smith and Dorrian, an all-female bench of the Inner House of the Court of Session (Scotland’s Civil Appeal Court), heard the appeal in the passing off case of Wise Property Care Limited v White Thomson Preservation Limited and Others. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives give guidelines to clergy giving prayers in those chambers. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
California Rule of Court 1.100 requires courts to grant accommodations to disabled people. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee heard testimony on overcriminalization of regulatory crimes. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
” Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting question, which Carver v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm
First, in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
This list becomes more coherent considering Ms Van Halen’s experience as a real estate developer, house flipper, and interior designer, apparently appealing to the US equivalent of the yummy mummy crowd. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am
The Fourth Amendment guarantees “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” except where there is a search warrant based on probable cause. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Does it count whether people are asked to join in by some gesture of participation? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:47 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In 1957 Lord Denning, speaking in a debate in the House of Lords on the Wolfenden Report, denounced homosexual acts as “unnatural vice” which “strikes at the integrity of the human race. [read post]
