Search for: "Q"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 22,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Those questions, as well as others in Section Q of the MDS, are intended to ensure that long-term care facilities provide all residents with the opportunity to learn about home and community-based services. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
During a Q&A session at the conference, Cliona Kimber posed a question about the levels of damages that may be available under DPD or GDPR for infringement of data protection rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
An interesting Q&A with the founder of Secret, an anonymous social messaging platform that was valued at $100 million before it shuttered as a result of bullying. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:45 am
The Department of Industrial Relations answers this commonly asked question about nonexempt employees working on the Fourth of July on its “Holidays” FAQ page: Q: Last week, I worked eight hours on the 4th of July holiday, which fell on Wednesday. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:29 am
Contractors should read the wording in their solicitations carefully, both in assessing potential protest grounds and also in ensuring that they are submitting responsive proposals, to determine whether the solicitation requires compliance with cybersecurity regulations at the time of proposal submission or at a later date (contractors also might consider addressing these issues in Q&A with the agency prior to proposal submittal). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
USCIS staff will demonstrate the new features of the InfoPass system for scheduling an appointment at one of their local offices, and then a Q&A session on the subject. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
My Q: why are we litigating a copyright case over a song released 45 years ago? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:43 pm
., Pamela Q. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:56 am
When evaluating whether the religious accommodation will cause an undue hardship, the EEOC (through the Employer Q&A) explains that employers may not speculate on whether other employees may seek the same accommodation and make decisions based on those speculations. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:44 pm
BackgroundSection 13(q) was added to the Exchange Act in 2010 by Section 1504 of the Dodd Frank Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:16 pm
(KHOU 11 News) Negligent Security? [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:28 pm
The Republican National Convention and Donald Trump will be in Cleveland at the Q July 18-21. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:11 pm
Alberto Huapaya OlivaresIntroducciónEl Traslado de Personas Condenadas en una de las instituciones de la Cooperación Judicial Internacional que más hondo sentido humanitario tiene, porque permite al interno extranjero la posibilidad de lograr su resocialización a través de entorno social de origen.El derecho a una nueva oportunidad que puede aspirarse a través de la posibilidad de cumplir su condena en su propio país es lo que motiva a los Estados a… [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Q: No. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:00 pm
Earlier, the State Bar of Wisconsin's "InsideTrack" newsletter posted an interview headlined "Q&A with Paul Clement: Top Advocate at the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Our next “Immigration Q & A Forum” is scheduled for Friday, July 8, 2016! [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:42 am
— via Smooth Transitions EEOC on Wellness Programs: Final Rule, Q&A, and Sample Notice — via Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space Who’s GINA and Why Does She Care About Your Employee Wellness Plan? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
A: I don't know, but a DOJ study confirms that the Ferguson Effect -- i.e., unhinged, ideological criticism of the police and their resulting increased caution -- has, indeed, contributed to the rise in murder.Our News Scan has this item, addressing the causes of the crisis-level 17% murder increase last year:The [DOJ] study offers two explanations regarding the Ferguson Effect and how it has impacted crime, specifically murder. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:18 pm
Scott is a Republican and hasn't been minding his p's and q's. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:59 pm
According to the Department of Labor Q&A site: The Department has concluded that the standard salary level of $455 weekly ($23,660 annually for a full-year employee) set in 2004 was too low to adequately account for the elimination of the former “long” duties test that ensured that employers could not avoid paying overtime by assigning lower-paid employees a minimal amount of exempt work. [read post]
