Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 17,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
On October 31, 2013, following a two-day jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Sean Sanford, appellant, was convicted on charges of first-degree murder, first degree assault, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and two counts of robbery with a deadly weapon. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:51 pm
On October 18, 2013, Reginald Hopson, the appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, of (1) first-degree assault, (2) second-degree assault, (3) two counts of reckless endangerment, (4) use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, (5) transporting a handgun in a vehicle, and ... [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
As the California Supreme Court explained in Collection Bureau of San Jose v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
McCoy contended that all of the more than 200 stories Brant downloaded were the subject of the single-count indictment. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:28 pm
In 2011, the Appellate Division held in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
The court rejects his arguments on all counts: The Court is skeptical of Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Fraternity Collection, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:13 am
Both the Oregon Court of Appeals and the Oregon Supreme Court so ruled in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
The Iran case (Bank Markazi v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
States. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Supreme Court in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
This was expanded on in that there was clearly no possibility of a mutually agreeable settlement if each party was to maintain their proposed price, and movement on this fundamental point seemed unlikely (and in any case would be seen as against competition law).Each party was then given 5 minutes to state their conclusions. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
Refusing to cede control of LinkedIn group supports noncompete, trade secret claims against employee
1 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
” Indeed, this count of the complaint, which CDM alleged as an alternative to the other counts, lacked any reference to confidential or secret information. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:11 am
After a jury in a federal prosecution convicted Lawrence Shaw of “17 counts of bank fraud in violation of” 18 U.S. [read post]