Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 16,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm
In Carrera v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
In the United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
In the United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
And such small portions!) [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
Both sides center their arguments on a test set forth in the 2015 case United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:16 pm
—People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm
Ruiz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Bembury v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Keith Allen Ball v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 6:49 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Blue-sky laws were needed “to protect the humble, honest citizens of the state, unlearned in the intricacy of business affairs as being conducted at this day, from being plundered and despoiled of their small earnings” by the “unscrupulous, cunning and deceitful. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
In Mazza v. [read post]
