Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 7821 - 7840 of 21,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 6:16 pm
The complaint lacked any explanation of the role that the payor played as a purchaser of Nexium.The decision is Pennsylvania Employee Benefit Trust Fund v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm by Mike
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
But to establish the point, the consumers would need to make particularized showings in different parts of the country, the court said.Even if callers heard identical sales pitches, Internet visitors saw the same website, and purchasers received the same fulfillment kit, these similarities established only that there was some factual overlap, not a predominant factual overlap among the claims and surely not one sufficient to overcome the key defect that the claims had to be resolved under… [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
For the Appellate Division, the fact that Svenson had made a profit from the sale of the photographs does not render the use of the photographs commercial, citing the Stephano v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:18 am by Anubha Sinha
He stated that the plaintiff company had been using the original art work since December 2006. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Joe Kristan
Cite: Order on Summary Judgement, 7/9/12: Bennett Dorrance et ux. v. [read post]